Ousted New Jersey official cites 59 chatbot answers to dispute harassment findings

By

Published

Reporting from The Verge

Former Lt. Gov. Dale Caldwell, who resigned after an investigation found he sexually harassed a staffer, told NJ PBS he ran the report through AI platforms about 59 times and none found harassment.

What it means for founders

  • Expect more people to treat chatbot output as proof in disputes with employers, courts and regulators. Legal and HR products need plain language about what an AI assessment is and is not.
  • Sycophancy is a product risk, not just a research problem. Tools that review evidence should argue both sides and say what they could not see.
  • Keep prompts alongside answers. An output without the prompt that produced it says little about how much weight it deserves.
  • Watch for courts and employers setting rules on AI generated analysis as evidence. Those rules will shape the legal tech market.

The story

Dale Caldwell resigned as New Jersey's lieutenant governor on September 25, after an outside investigation found he had sexually harassed a staffer and repeatedly broken state ethics rules. He has since been disputing the findings in a run of media interviews, and in one of them he offered an unusual defense: chatbots agreed with him.

What he said

Speaking to anchor Rob Nelson on NJ PBS, Caldwell said he ran the investigative report through several AI platforms about 59 times, each time asking what their findings would be, and that none concluded there had been sexual harassment. He urged others to do the same and suggested AI could be used to stop what he called legal abuse.

Caldwell, 66, also said he was under investigation for 133 of his 245 days in office and was not given the chance to respond to the report before it was released. He has called the inquiry a setup and says he is exploring legal options.

What the investigation found

Governor Mikie Sherrill's administration hired an outside law firm in May. The probe, led jointly by former state Attorney General Christopher Porrino, concluded that Caldwell tried to use his position to win a promotion for a state worker he was dating, and that he made a sexually suggestive remark to a female staffer, among other findings. Sherrill called on him to resign once the report was out. Her spokesman has said the independent investigation substantiated serious ethics violations and found conduct that amounted to sexual harassment.

Why the chatbot argument fails

Large language models are known to be sycophantic: they tend to give answers that match the framing and hopes of the person asking. Someone convinced of his own innocence, asking again and again what a model would conclude, is likely to steer it toward agreement. Running the same request 59 times does not make the answers independent. The models also saw only the document they were given, without the witness interviews or evidence behind it, and none has any standing to rule on harassment.

The Verge made a similar point, doubting that Caldwell was ever looking for an answer that confirmed the findings against him.

What we don't know yet

Caldwell has not said which platforms he used or exactly what he typed, or whether he will release the transcripts. It is also unclear whether he plans to bring any AI output into a legal challenge.

Sources

Enki Daily

Get stories like this every weekday morning.

The day's AI stories for founders, each with what it means for your company. Free.

More in Policy & Safety

How Enki covers newsCorrectionsReport an error

Search Enki

Search AI tools, categories and news